拜登政府应该抓好五大国防优先事项(英文)

2021-2-2  智邦网

编译  致远

据 Defensenews网2月1日报道

美国公民反对政府浪费政策和研究主任西恩•肯尼迪撰文指出:拜登政府应该抓住机会推动国防部几个关键领域改革。

首先,应取消“海外应急行动拨款账户”(OCF)。2001年9月11日的OCF最初用于应对袭击的紧急支出账户,但目前已转变成国防部扩大支出的行贿基金。

2015财年, OCO经费的50%被用于非紧急项目开支。OCF开支长期超过美军在战区驻军的用途。

拜登政府不可能大幅度增加在阿富汗、伊拉克驻军,除非进行改革,否则2021财年将进一步持续OCF的巨额支出。

第二,拜登政府必须推动改革,提高国防部财务的透明度和可信度。

第三,国防部必须明确改进首席管理官运行管理机制,直到在2021财年国防授权法案被取消,该职位一直是国防部排名第三的文职官员。

第四,国防采办混乱不堪,几起臭名昭著的采购案例使五角大楼的系统性问题暴露无遗, F-35 战机项目是典型例子,总采办经费如今已超过4280亿美元,比最初预计的2330亿美元上涨近1倍。

第五,拜登政府应该促进五角大楼领导层的稳定性,每一任国防部长应该给美国最大的政府部门明确不同的防务工作重点。特朗普总统撤换了两个正式防长和四个代理防长,为历届政府之最。拜登总统应努力扭转这种混乱局面。


These five items should top Biden’s defense priorities

The Biden administration has the opportunity to institute reforms in several crucial areas at the Department of Defense.

First and foremost, it should eliminate the overseas contingency operations account. The continued justification for the OCO has reached the stage of parody. Originally intended for emergency spending in response to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the account has transitioned into a slush fund designed to inflate spending at the DoD far above the baseline budget and for purposes unrelated to foreign wars.

In fiscal 2015, approximately 50 percent of OCO funding was for nonemergency items. An August 2019 Congressional Budget Office report noted that approximately 85 percent of funding for the OCO in FY20 and FY21 “is designated for base-budget and ‘enduring’ activities,” funding maintenance in support of foreign operations that will continue regardless of force size.

OCO spending has long outpaced the military’s presence in combat zones. In FY08, the U.S. deployed an average of 187,000 troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. OCO spending topped $187 billion that year, equating to $1 million per service member. The DoD currently has approximately 5,000 troops stationed in these countries, meaning the $70.7 billion in OCO spending in FY20 equates to $14.1 million in funding per service member — more than 14 times the amount in FY08.

With President Joe Biden unlikely to substantially increase the military’s footprint in Afghanistan and Iraq, outsized OCO spending will continue in FY21 and beyond, barring reform.

The DoD has received approximately $2 trillion from the OCO since 2001. Were it considered to be a federal agency, the FY20 OCO funding would make it the fourth largest, dwarfing spending at all other agencies except the departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, and Veterans Affairs.

The incoming administration must also expand efforts to make DoD finances more transparent and accountable. The bookkeeping is so abysmal that areas within the DoD have been on the Government Accountability Office’s list of programs at high risk for waste, fraud, abuse and mismanagement since 1995.

The financial black hole is nowhere more evident than in the DoD’s inability to pass a clean audit, unlike every other federal agency. On Nov. 16, 2020, the Pentagon announced that for the third straight year it failed its financial review. Progress has been incremental, with seven of 24 DoD agencies thus far producing clean audits. However, the DoD estimates that it will not be able to pass an audit before 2027, or 37 years after it was required to do so by law.

The DoD must also determine the replacement mechanism for the chief management officer position, which was the No. 3 civilian slot until it was eliminated in the FY21 National Defense Authorization Act.

Despite identifying $22.3 billion in savings between FY18 and FY21, legislators bowed to Pentagon pressure, distributing the duties and responsibilities of the role to various existing positions with far less authority.

The acquisition side is also a mess, including several infamous procurement disasters that epitomize the Pentagon’s systemic problems. The foremost example is the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The program has been under continuous development since the contract was awarded in 2001, and has encountered innumerable delays and cost overruns. Total acquisition costs now exceed $428 billion, nearly double the initial estimate of $233 billion. The total costs for the F-35 are estimated to reach $1.727 trillion over the lifetime of the program. On Jan. 14, 2021, then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller labeled the Joint Strike Fighter a “piece of sh*t.”

Enough said.

Many of the problems with the F-35 program can be traced to the decision to develop and procure the Joint Strike Fighter simultaneously. Whenever problems have been identified, contractors needed to go back and make changes to aircraft that were already assembled, adding to overall costs.

Of course none of this has stopped the Pentagon from asking for Joint Strike Fighter funding, and members of Congress from supplying it, oftentimes exceeding the request from the DoD. This trend continued in FY20, when legislators added $2.1 billion in earmarks to fund the acquisition of 22 Joint Strike Fighters beyond the amount requested by the Pentagon, bringing the total amount of earmarks for the program to $8.9 billion since FY01.

Lastly, the Biden administration would do well to introduce some stability into Pentagon leadership. Every defense secretary brings to the job different priorities for the government’s largest bureaucracy. President Donald Trump burned through two confirmed and four acting secretaries, the most for any administration. President Biden should endeavor to reverse this churn.


相关信息

美国防部授予3000万美元合同促进稀土加工(英文)

普京批准俄美《新削减战略武器条约》延期(英文)

美国防创新单元开发“蜜网”先进网络防御系统(英文)

英军组织大规模“多无人机助力”蜂群演示(英文)

美陆军实验室组织一体化联合作战系统实验(英文)

北约秘书长呼吁盟友加强国防投资

      韩国推出天基激光空间监视计划(英文)

美军为联合全域作战制定新的数据标准(英文)

拜登要求五角大楼将气候变化纳入新战略与战争游戏(英文)

诺格公司赢得美空军36亿美元战场机载通信节点合同(英文)

美导弹防御局确定高超声速武器天基传感器承包商(英文)

日本防卫省:先进网络是2035年空战的关键(英文)

美陆军将继续推进六大现代化优先项目(英文)

全球防务开支连续七年保持增长 达19万亿美元(英文)

英国推动“忠诚僚机”作战无人机联合研发(英文)

美陆军制定体系数字战略(英文)