美军基于物理模型、数字孪生与数据驱动提高作战完备性

美国防务新闻网站3月8日讯

武器装备的可靠性直接关乎战斗力,关乎战争的胜败。为确保武器装备作战完备性,美国防部年度国防预算的40%(约2900亿美元)投入在作战和维修上。武器装备采办过程中,在装备分析方案的里程碑A阶段以及技术成熟与风险减低的里程碑B阶段的成本,决定了武器装备全寿命周期成本的70%。简言之,研制阶段的周期和成本越低,武器装备的可靠性越高。基于状态的维修(CBM)是目前的主要维修模式,但仍然存在难以找到部组件故障根本原因等问题。基于物理模型的维修(PBM)是一种更好的维修模式,装备运行包线基础上,可对武器装备的部组件、系统和体系进行分析验证,结合经过战场实时数据校准后的数字孪生,可对故障模式和根本原因做出高质量预测。基于模型的数字孪生,可以帮助工程师重新设计零部件,完成数字线索。物理模型与数据驱动模型的结合,对故障分析所需数据和时间会更少。在基于状态维修和预测维修中嵌入物理与数据驱动模型,可提升对飞机近期、远期性能与寿命的预测性。


Physics-based simulation can improve force readiness

By: Brig. Gen. Steve Bleymaier (ret.)    DefenseNews 3月8日

B-1B Lancer tail number 85-0092 is lifted and placed on flatbed trailers for its journey to Wichita, Kan., on April 24, 2020. The National Institute for Aviation Research at Wichita State University planned to scan every part of the aircraft to create a digital twin for research. (Daryl Mayer/U.S. Air Force)

The U.S. war-fighting leadership faces two real and growing threats — one external, one internal. We can’t control or fully predict the external threat but, internally, there is much we can do.

Lethality, agility, speed and technology: These words describe our capacity to fight. Yet, much of our latent capacity is held back by reliability issues — the bane of all war fighters.

Nearly two-fifths of the Department of Defense budget — $290 billion — focuses on operations and maintenance to ensure weapon system readiness. This means less money for new equipment, less equipment availability and less fighting capacity. Those liabilities represent the core internal threat.

If the DoD can reduce the money spent on sustainment, it can increase the money available for new procurement. This statement sounds easy but is hard to execute.

Seventy percent of a system’s life-cycle cost is set during the materiel solution analysis phase before Milestone A and during the technology maturation and risk reduction phase before Milestone B. Decisions made during these phases disproportionately affect reliability. However, there is no requirement for original equipment manufacturers, or OEM, to include design for sustainment data as part of their proposals.

What if OEMs could increase a system’s reliability and decrease its life-cycle cost early in the development process by creating physics-based simulations and digital twins calibrated with operational data? Engineers could foresee sustainment issues during product design, increasing product quality and readiness while lessening operational cost and risk.

In simple terms, development time and costs go down while system reliability goes up.

Condition-based maintenance, or CBM, is the current approach to improve the reliability and availability of fielded weapon systems. But today’s CBM methods fall short.

CBM acts purely on a data-based approach, fitting algorithms to large, streaming data sets, thus relying heavily on data quality, velocity, veracity and frequency — with data interdependencies often left for experts to deduce. System technicians normally receive a few days’ notice when a component might fail. Lacking a root cause analysis, these reports cannot address why a component fails.

There’s a better way. Physics-based simulation models can, based on the operational envelope, represent the behavior of a component, system, and system of systems at various degrees. Hybrid digital twins, calibrated with real-time data from the field, can deliver a higher-quality-of-failure mode and root-cause predictions.

Equipped with simulation-based digital twins for every asset as well as field insights on operational performance, system fatigue and failures can be efficiently leveraged to help engineers redesign key parts, completing the digital thread.

Combining physics with data-driven simulations delivers actionable understanding in much less time with less data from the field. With simulation embedded in CBM/predictive maintenance processes, one can improve prediction for near- to long-term performance and for the life of the assets by component and aircraft tail number.

What’s the end result? Sustainment organizations can schedule maintenance rather than react to unplanned component and system failures while consuming less resources. Additionally, units can optimize how they operate and sustain the force to ensure war-fighting readiness.

Fifty percent of large industrial companies are planning to use hybrid digital twins to develop predictive, data-informed, decision-ready actionable insights. With digital twins, an asset’s health and performance data digitally connect to its virtual equivalent and reveal whether it requires maintenance now or later, or if it can be extended in the field to increase mission readiness. Industry can expect a 30 percent increase in cycle times of key processes, including maintenance, to improve operational availability.

Lufthansa Technik leverages digital twins to perform predictive maintenance of jet engine turbine blades. This helps synchronize blade life to improve reliability and reduce maintenance costs based on real-world operating conditions.

In the same way that every person is unique, the operational history of every defense system, traceable through its serial number, is likewise unique. This history helps forecast its future reliability outlook. But how can engineering teams take advantage of this data granularity?

By leveraging an open and interoperable simulation platform architecture, engineers can readily merge authoritative sources of truth together within a sustainment digital thread. This helps them perform simulation and process data management, and it enables data traceability.

Simulation for sustainment leads to a greater proportion of the defense budget being available for new weapons, enables greater weapons availability and greater predictability, empowers a greater force lethality, and plays a critical role in safeguarding and supporting war fighters around the world.

Retired U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Steve Bleymaier is the vice president for global strategy and government programs, federal aerospace, and defense at simulation specialist Ansys.

声明:本平台发布部分内容来自公开资料或者网络,版权归原作者所有,转载的目的在于传递信息及用于网络分享,不代表本平台赞同其观点,如涉版权问题,请与我们联系,我们第一时间处理。